<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seton Hall College Republicans &#187; legalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.setonhallcrs.org/tag/legalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.setonhallcrs.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama takes new direction on medicinal marijuana</title>
		<link>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/10/22/obama-takes-new-direction-on-medicinal-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/10/22/obama-takes-new-direction-on-medicinal-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Tracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gonzalez v. Raich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.setonhallcrs.org/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, President Obama released a memo regarding the federal enforcement of marijuana laws. Eight states, such as California, have legalized medicinal marijuana (such as for its use in dealing with the symptoms of chemotherapy for cancer patients). Medicinal marijuana is given out at dispensaries, which are legal according to state law. However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-379" src="http://www.setonhallcrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/obama-thinking-300x195.jpg" alt="obama-thinking" width="212" height="137" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">A few days ago, President Obama released a memo <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2009/10/19/will-federal-medical-marijuana">regarding the federal enforcement of marijuana laws</a>. Eight states, such as California, have legalized medicinal marijuana (such as for its use in dealing with the symptoms of chemotherapy for cancer patients). Medicinal marijuana is given out at dispensaries, which are legal according to state law.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">However, the federal government still outlaws marijuana through the Controlled Substances Act. Therefore, federal agents have the legal authority to pursue marijuana as a controlled substance. However, they also have the discretion of applying their limited resources towards better objectives, which is what this shift seems to be based on.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">As a campaign promise, Obama said he would end federal raids on state-legal marijuana dispensaries. This is an example of Obama&#8217;s actions finally coming in line with his rhetoric. If nothing else, a baby step in the right direction is better than a big step backwards. We can also soon expect an <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2009/10/16/crack-sentencing-reform-gettin">end to the sentencing disparity</a> between crack and cocaine penalties.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">As an interesting note on the issue of states&#8217; rights in the War on Drugs, the 2005 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Raich#The_government.27s_case">Supreme Court case <em>Gonzalez v. Raich</em></a> ruled that the federal government had the authority to regulate a person <em>privately growing and consuming</em> his own marijuana based on&#8230; wait for it&#8230; the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce_clause">interstate commerce clause</a> of the Constitution! Clearly, private creation and consumption is basis for regulating trade between states.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Also to be noted that &#8220;liberal&#8221; justices Souter and Ginsberg ruled in favor of this ruling, and &#8220;arch-conservatives&#8221; Clarence Thomas and William Rehnquist dissented based on the obvious Constitutional meaning of the commerce clause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/10/22/obama-takes-new-direction-on-medicinal-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Short Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/09/29/a-short-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/09/29/a-short-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Tracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states' rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.setonhallcrs.org/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ll6EwvdRzE Romney vs. Ron Paul on the issue of medicinal marijuana. Who follows the Republican mantra of federalism? Who values freedom, not just on the &#8220;easy&#8221; issues like taxes and regulation? Take from the video what you will, but if the Republican Party is going to govern again without sounding like hypocrites, we&#8217;d better look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="youtube">
<object width="425" height="355">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Ll6EwvdRzE&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;feature=player_embedded#t=291" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Ll6EwvdRzE&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;feature=player_embedded#t=291" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="355"></embed>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ll6EwvdRzE">www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ll6EwvdRzE</a></p></p>
<p>Romney vs. Ron Paul on the issue of medicinal marijuana.</p>
<p><span id="more-257"></span>Who follows the Republican mantra of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism_in_the_United_States">federalism</a>? Who values freedom, not just on the &#8220;easy&#8221; issues like taxes and regulation? Take from the video what you will, but if the Republican Party is going to govern again without sounding like hypocrites, we&#8217;d better look for getting more <em>statesmen</em> and less <em>politicians</em> in office.</p>
<p>Also, it should be noted that Obama himself went on a downward arc in terms of legalization: from using pot as a youth, to supporting only <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQr9ezr8UeA">decriminalization</a>, to only wanting <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/11/25/479649.aspx">limited reform</a>, to finally <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/132508.html">laughing off the issue</a> altogether as President and allowing the Feds to <a href="http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2009/02/is-the-dea-the.html">crack down </a>on state-legalized medicinal marijuana dispensiaries (breaking a <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/126533.html">campaign promise</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Full disclosure: I have NEVER used marijuana in any way in my life.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.setonhallcrs.org/2009/09/29/a-short-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
